Sure, he’s curmudgeonly and crotchety. Sure, he had an event with Stephanie Birkitt and got blackmailed for it. But David Letterman is good at what he does.
That’s due in partial to his capability to emanate good humerous entertainment out of nothing. When he goes over to his table after the monologue, you never know what’s coming.
Case in point? Last night, Dave went off a New York Times’ front page story from this past week end on the augmenting use of the word “douche” on TV.
“Who knew The New York Times had sufficient income to compensate a man to equate the word ‘douche’?” Dave asked, steadfastly derisive the paper’s journalism.
Check out Dave’s diatribe about the square subsequent …
This Douche Thing
Letterman additionally mocked militant designer Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, whose hearing is coming and whose print appeared on top of the “douche” story.
In a waggish in reserve separate to his altogether indicate (or may be this was the point, and the douche bit was the aside, who knows), he compared Mohammed to a mislaid puppy yearning to be adopted (left) and a dipsomaniac who only woke up (right).
One competence report Khalid by a sure tenure commencement with a D, a word mostly interconnected with the identical tiwn sister “bag.” But that’s routinely indifferent for wastes of space similar to Jon Gosselin and not tangible terrorists. Better fitness subsequent time, Khalid.
