Archive for October 25, 2010

People repository have been stating which Taylor Swift incited up for the Saturday Night Life after celebration this week end in New York City with Jake Gyllenhaal as her date.

First, the dual attended the promote of Saturday Night Live in Manhattan, which was hosted by Swift’s great friend, Emma Stone.

“They showed up together,” a source tells PEOPLE. “They walked around together backstage, but they were clever not to be seen as good close. It was tough to discuss it if they were together, but everybody was repelled which she brought him.”

On Sunday, Swift, twenty and Gyllenhaal, 29, brunched with an additional integrate at Al Di La in Brooklyn and, says an onlooker, looked “friendly.” They were additionally speckled together strolling around Brooklyn’s Park Slope neighborhood.

Swift is substantially usually perplexing to find her subsequent mortar in to popularity. Soon they’ll mangle up and she’ll write her subsequent shitty e-cry strain about how he didn’t encounter her needs or go down on her. The John Mayer lane was the usually thing which done people comprehend she had a brand new manuscript out and it was timed so ideally to go with her longhorn shit TV miniseries “Fearless”.

Besides, I don’t think there could be a some-more tedious integrate than Taylor Swift and Jake Gyllenhall, good may be Jake and Reese Whiterspoon. At slightest this time around Swift won’t have to be concerned about her male going after alternative women, but if I were her I wouldn’t let Jake on any city slicker ranches lest he go all brokeback on her.

Taylor Swift Dating Jake Gyllenhaal
Taylor Swift Dating Jake Gyllenhaal
Taylor Swift Dating Jake Gyllenhaal
Taylor Swift Dating Jake Gyllenhaal
Taylor Swift Dating Jake Gyllenhaal
Taylor Swift Dating Jake Gyllenhaal
Taylor Swift Dating Jake Gyllenhaal
Taylor Swift Dating Jake Gyllenhaal

Mel Gibson is foaming at the mouth at the producers of “The Hangover 2″ for booting him from the flick. Mel was ostensible to have a teenager purpose as a Bangkok permanent skin stain artist which was seen as a quip for his utterly scruffy career, but producers were discerning to cut him lax when a little of the expel members objected to operative with him.

A source tighten to Mel said:

He doesn’t assimilate since Mike Tyson, a drug user who incited his hold up around, was since a possibility whilst Mel was kicked to the curb. Everybody deserves a second chance.

My thinking, injured as it competence be, is which Tyson was reduction of a big understanding since he was personification himself. Not usually that, but he was personification himself as kind of a loser. It wasn’t meant to be a little step in a remedial process. It wasn’t going to lead to some-more behaving work, and it wasn’t to infer he’s the kind of man you can certitude with a multimillion dollar project. If anything, he was goofing on himself, his past and his present. Getting to cameo in a movie where dipsomaniac guys arise up and he’s in the room is usually a marginally improved day for Tyson than essentially removing to cling to out with guys in Vegas who have been so dipsomaniac they won’t recollect they partied with him the subsequent morning. In the context of a Vegas-set comedy, waking up after merrymaking with a has-been seems comical, but additionally inside of the area of reality. Which (according to my college play teachers) is what creates humerous entertainment unequivocally better: the intensity that, no have a disproportion how outlandish, this could happen. And which arrange of cameo would’ve usually worked with a genuine has-been. And Tyson was kinda perfect, since he’s a has-been clown, and he competence kill you, so you don’t wish to screw with him, creation the tragedy some-more real.

Whereas Gibson, notwithstanding any hype, wasn’t you do this for a giggle or as a favor. He longed for to infer he could still be devoted to work in a vital suit picture. And may be he could. But you can’t error any one for not wanting to be a partial of it, no female parent who they worked with previously. This is a partial which doesn’t have to be Gibson, ruin it doesn’t have to be an A-lister. It could be Bronson Pinchot. It could be Ernie Hudson. It could be Screech. Or it could be an unknown. Unless this impression was ostensible to be “Mel Gibson” who is such a renegade in Hollywood which this is his brand new job? What disproportion does it have to the story?

In conclusion. Go blow yourself Mel.